![]() ![]()  | 
  
|  
      
       | 
       A religious leader responds to video depiction of Percy Schmeiser's battle against Monsanto by Rev. Peter S. Sawtell, Executive Director 
(May 15, 2002 -- CropChoice news) -- I think it is a record for me. I received six virus-infected e-mails in one morning, and around 15 through the course of this
   week. There's an energetic new virus on the loose!  
   Blocking those viruses from my computer helps justify the expense
   and hassles of buying anti-virus software, and keeping the virus
   definitions up-to-date. Those defensive costs are now an
   essential part of living in our electronically-connected world.  
   Unfortunately, there are lots of competent programmers who find a
   sense of power in being able to inflict damage on other's
   computers. And so there are thousands of computer viruses on the
   loose. Because of their actions, all the rest of us need to go to
   substantial lengths to protect ourselves from those malicious
   programs.  
   Once a virus is put in circulation, there's no way to call it
   back, no way to exterminate it. It will propagate and spread.
   Just like the biological viruses for AIDS or the flu, a computer
   virus can quickly spread to a whole population. All that we can
   do is protect our own systems, and try to keep from spreading the
   infection to others.  
   Thankfully, there are good programs that can help stave off the
   potential epidemics of computer viruses. The cost and the hassles
   are worth it -- for us as individuals, and for the broader
   electronic community.  
   This week's snail-mail brought a report and a video from the
   Sierra Club on genetically-modified organisms (GMOs). (A link to
   the on-line report is at the end of this message.)  
   Reading the Sierra Club report while fighting this week's surge
   in computer virus attacks helped me to see a parallel between
   these two pervasive parts of our high-tech world.  
   Just like a computer virus turned loose on the Internet, the
   genetic information of a modified plant is turned loose into a
   rural community when a crop is planted. Pollen and seeds are not
   -- and cannot be -- confined to a single field. Wind, insects,
   and seeds that fall from trucks spread the modified genetic
   information into neighboring fields, where it can mingle with the
   genetics of similar crops planted by a different farmer.  
   So what? That new genetic information can infect and corrupt the
   crops of a farmer. But the problem is larger than the creation of
   an impure field. The scope of the economic and legal issues
   emerge in a lawsuit filed against a Canadian farmer by
   agricultural giant Monsanto. Similar cases are being pursued in
   the US and other countries, too.  
   Monsanto has developed a genetically modified form of the canola
   plant that is resistant to Monsanto's Roundup herbicide. Monsanto
   patented their product, and claims total ownership of that unique
   genetic code. Farmers cannot buy the seed itself; they can only
   buy rights to plant it.  
   Canadian farmer Percy Schemeiser did not plant the Monsanto
   variety of canola, but some of the plants in his field were
   "Roundup resistant" because of contamination from other sources.
   Monsanto filed suit against Schemeiser, claiming patent
   infringement. The Canadian courts ruled in favor of Monsanto. The
   farmer was fined tens of thousands of dollars, and had to forfeit
   his entire harvest, for having a small amount of Monsanto's GMO
   in his field. (A link to the farmer's website is at the end of
   this message.)  
   What happened to Schemeiser is like getting a computer virus, and
   then finding out that the programmer who created the virus can
   sue you for having the virus, and can also claim ownership of all
   the data on your computer. The parallel breaks down, though,
   because there's nothing that corresponds to your computer's
   anti-virus software to keep the GMOs out of a field.  There is no
   way to defend against the GMO infection.  
   Like a computer virus, once those new genes are introduced into
   the world, it is impossible to call them back. They will
   propagate and spread. Farmers cannot protect themselves from a
   GMO infection, and yet they are held liable by the seed companies
   when the new plant varieties appear in their fields.  
   The technology for creating new genetic strains has moved much
   more quickly than the legal, scientific and ethical capacity to
   answer the complex issues that are raised.  
   There are many complicated and controversial issues involved in
   the development and spread of GMOs. They touch on religious
   questions about the creation of new life forms, environmental
   concerns about the impact of those life forms on habitats and
   ecosystems, issues of human health, consumer rights to
   information about food ingredients, and legal questions about the
   ownership of patents to genetic information.  
   Churches can play an important role in addressing these issues
   through study and advocacy. Please contact Eco-Justice Ministries
   if you would like to explore ways of working on these issues in
   your congregation or community. 
Shalom! 
Rev. Peter S. Sawtell, Executive Director  | |